Archive
Business

Ontario Enhances Support For Innovative Companies

NEWS

Ontario’s Emerging Technologies Fund is open for business.

The $250-million fund will co-invest – along with qualified venture capital funds and other private investors – directly into companies in high-growth sectors that are aligned with Ontario’s Innovation Agenda:

Clean technology
Life sciences and advanced health technology
Digital media and information and communications technology.
The fund is designed to help innovative technology companies find the capital they need to grow in Ontario. It was announced by the province in March in response to the current economic conditions and the reduction in investment capital available to emerging and high-growth companies.

Guidelines for investment are now available online at: www.ontario.ca/ocgc.

QUOTES

“The Emerging Technologies Fund is one more step the McGuinty government is taking to help ensure that innovative people and companies have access to the capital they need to continue growing their business and creating jobs in Ontario.”
- Minister of Research and Innovation, John Milloy

QUICK FACTS

Ontario’s Emerging Technologies Fund will address a lack of venture capital activity by co-investing with qualified investors directly into high-growth technology companies.
Eligible companies must have a significant corporate footprint in Ontario.
This initiative complements the $205-million Ontario Venture Capital Fund, a partnership between Ontario and leading corporate and institutional investors that is investing in venture capital and growth equity funds that support innovative, high-growth companies.
LEARN MORE

The Ontario Emerging Technologies Fund

Ontario’s Innovation Agenda

Canada’s Venture Capital and Private Equity Association – first quarter venture capital results

Comment

Notes from The 2009 Canadian Telecom Summit

I was extremely excited when Sean Van Koughnett, director of Velocity, selected me as one of the 7 Velocity residents (and past residents) to attend the 3-day Canadian Telecom Summit.

The conference has a whopping $2,250 ticket price, so I was extremely pleased that we only had to pay $100 dollars + hotel fees. Thank you Sean for giving us the rare opportunity to attend such a high caliber conference!

Last year, the conference attracted the likes of the President & CEO of Ericsson Canada, President & CEO of Rogers Communications and even the University of Waterloo president, David Johnston himself! This year was equally as impressive! Check out the line of speakers:

During the conference, I took some notes on my HTC Tilt (♥ the keyboard). Here they are for your viewing pleasure (note that the notes were quickly taken):

Palm Pre Demo:

Really nice UI, but what do productivity users, such as all business users think of it?

They have an IM app that links all messaging protocols together, but why don’t they just thread all of them together? If you’re talking to someone using MSN on your mobile and the other side disconnects. Why not continue the conversation using SMS?

CRTC Presentation:

Began presentation with the important topic of net neutrality, throttling and network shaping.

CRTC agress with Bell’s position on the need for traffic throttling to preserve the integrity of their service, but realizes afterwards that it is a bigger issue than they had previously realized. No shit. If they’d like to “preserve the integrity of their service” they should stop it with the false advertising (ahem, ‘unlimited downloading’?).

CRTC sees a need to increase Canadian content on the web. Subsidy scheme beign considered, but will discuss in the near future. Political answer for a political issue. How quaint :)

“The web revolution right now will influence our society as much as it did with the industrial revolution.” Cool – if our school systems were built on the basis of industrial design (students students go in, smarter students come out) then the web revolution will teach society that a linear learning path is not the ideal way for human beings to learn. I want that to happen right now! I see so many grade ‘A’ students who lack important characteristics – such as open-mindedness/free-thinking.

MTS Allstream Presentation:

“Businesses with an increase broadband capability also enjoy an increase in growth and overall employee satisfaction.” I wonder what these employees do with their faster internet ;)

What Customers Want:
- Big companies to feel smaller, more nimble.

- Small companies to feel bigger, have the capability of large firms

Industry challenges – Canada lagging in telecom investment – outdated competitive framework. How honest, and that coming from a service provider too!

Competition must be placed on networks, not between them.

Customers tend to buy services as a package from providers. If you are a service provider and you don’t offer television then you are losing on potential profit!

CWTA Presentation:

16 to 21 percent increase in mobile web usages. Random business idea: SMS usage is still growing rapidly. How do you use SMS to make money? An email to SMS service?

Internet drives innovation wherever it is embraced – so young users dictate how the web will be developed. More reasons to start a web-based company.

CBC Presentation:

Very very surprising presentation. Talks about the fact that CBC has always been at the forefront of using innovative mediums for distributing media. First to use Twitter, first to provide full-streaming, first to use podcasts in Canada.

Interesting fact: Streaming video does not cannibalize television viewership for Olympics 2008. Not a solid fact to prove streaming video doesn’t actually cannibalize television viewerships in general. Older age groups watch the Olympics, those who would watch it would watch it in any medium. Those who normally wouldn’t watch it on TV might watch it on the web due to convenience.

Awesomeness Panel Discussion:

You know something is awesome if it’s named so. This discussion was absolutely amazing. It was the most memorable discussion I’ve ever seen. It involved 4 top lawyers in the country that represent some of Canada’s biggest companies. These are the titans, and man were they fierce. Insults were thrown around, not of the personal kind but well-formulated low-blows relating to their positions on the market (ownerships of varying companies) and ‘hidden’ self-interests that became not so hidden (anymore). As intense as it was, everyone (including the panel themselves) found it hilarious. Well, except for that one guy that was steaming at the end.

Government is not stimulating digital but rather promoting the analog industry. Taxes service providers and puts the money earned into the failing auto industry. This one made me laugh and then made me think hard. Then, laughed again. Talk about over-simplification.

So why should service providers open access to smaller players? We’re the ones spending billions in developing infrastructure.

Government data involing internet speeds in Canada and how it’s so low is garbage. It doesn’t take into account of Shaw’s (and other’s) latest offerings, such as 50 – 100 mbps connections.

We can create a pipe dedicated to P2P for our customers, but that’s not what our customers want. I BEG TO DIFFER! Obviously, Rogers publishing subdisiary doesn’t enjoy people sharing their content with each other.

Internet is successful today because it is built and mainted by engineers. If we regulate service providers, then all will fail.

Note to self: Look into Dec 8 CRTC Forced Access – many service providers want this removed.

75% of revenues are from wireless services, not wireline.

The government is forcing service providers to make a decision through regulatory means on whether or not to build infrastructure in small towns. Do we really need to go? Give us the freedom to decide. It’s healthy! – No way. Corporations always follow the money. There is little to be made in small towns. Government should step in to avoid abandoning small towns and force them to live in the past.

Clear to me that titan telco’s do not believe int he role of the government. Why should they? They are self sufficient and sustainable! Very dangerous as corporations get bigger and bigger.

Cisco Presentation:

“Transformation of service providers to experience providers.”

Cisco trying to have the first mover advantage.

Lots and lots of mention on the ‘Connected Life’. First phase involves the home (information), followed by the media enabled home (entertainment), then visual networking (more effective communication). Isn’t this what Microsoft is doing with MediaCenter?

If Web 2.0 could be summarized as interaction then web 3.0 would be about recommendations and customization. Aren’t we there already? I really wish people would stop versioning the web. There are no clear definitions of web 1.0, web 2.0 and so on. If you’re going to version the web, at least set a standard for definition. Isn’t web 3.0 about the marriage between hardware and the internet?

CTV Presentation:

Mostly on the Winder Olympics.

CTV will be offering 14 different camera views for viewers to choose from. Hooray for customization!

Will be similar to the Obama inaugauration in that it will have live chat, Facebook connectivity, use of Twitter etc…

Twitter for athletes = not a good idea when they are in the midst of their sport. Actually, illegal (bylaw) for an athlete to be acting as a journalist. So, when XXX the skier broker his legs and blogged about it, he got into trouble and was almost suspended.

Broadcasters to aggregrate athletes’ websites, accounts (Twitter, Facebook) etc..

Drop in viewership in 1996 because kids used to watch the Olympics with their parents.

Talks of Twitter makes me realize it’s purpose on the web. Because it is still alive, there must be an underlying reason. More about that in the next blog post entitled, “Facebook’s Twin Brother – Maybe Twitter Isn’t Dead.”

Net Neutrality Panel Discussion:

Man was this boring. Nothing like the panel discussion above. Everyone all agree that DPI is required and traffic shaping is required.

CEO of Sandvine hints that in the future, users may be able to decide which app gets more priority over bandwidth.

Mike Lee is a bit of a jerk. (Chief Strategy Officer – Rogers Communications)

Comverse:

Interesting how everyone at this conference talks about their strategies on selling to the @ Generation which is supposedly us. They should turn around :)

She is clearly very nervous! Poor woman.

“Crisis is a terrible thing to waste”

Haha, quote of the day: “Back in the days, people used to mate to communicate…I meant meet…Back in the days people used to only MEET to communicate”

Really truthful slide deck picture, where there’s this girl smiling and hugging a wall of information (represented by 0 and 1′s). The wall is also hugging the girl and has a human form (kind of like wrapping a sheet over someone’s face) – shows our emotional attachment to the web.

People are worn out…too much ads and too much data, which causes ad blindness. That’s why relevance is the key to marketers. Contextual displays significantly reduces information overload.

People do not take BS on their mobile as opposed to desktops and laptops - my rationale: smaller screen, limit of processing resources and the personal nature of mobile will put more emphasis on UI for all existing computer/web apps even if they aren’t exclusively for mobile consumption.

Rogers Presentation:

The Senior VP of Business Markets presented. He was older than others but I think he was one of the better presenters. The other presenters were well-composed, but he was absolutely cool and calm. No ‘uh’ or ‘um’ or any awkward pauses at all. His presentation was absolutely flawless, and yet it didn’t appear rehearsed.

“If you’re ever in a meeting with a bunch of lawyers and they won’t shut up. Just mention the term ‘conscientious parallelism’ “

Huawei Dinner:

William Gibson – a re-known Canadian sci-fi writer that predicted the internet and other pervasive technologies existing today.

Operators own user’s granular location, and can pinpoint location and time to deliver contextual content. It’s not donen right now, but Huawei urges this to happen to bring the culture of the web to mobile and really bring out the full potential of mobiles.

Last Day Panel Discussion:

Canada has the highest penetration rate of broadband, followed closely by the US.

There are mostly two models: subscription or ad driven.

Oirtability of the TV will be the future – Microsoft’s Mediaroom will provide the ‘connected TV experience’. There are already over 3 million subscribers for Mediaroom, which I think is still in beta mode for Canadians – as always.

Windows 7 will act as the glue to the experiences possible for all the devices in a home.

Future will involve:

- bringing the web culture to mobile

- ex. When calling someone the operator will announce the receiver of the call’s status, such as whether he/she is driving right now, and gives the option to leave a voicemail or forward the call.

Summary and Lessons Learned

- The leaders of Canada’s biggest organizations have a few things in common: They are as bold as they are aggressive. And though aggressive, they are very well-composed and speaks in a manner that draws you in. It’s clear that these people aren’t super-heroes with some divine given power. They are people who understand uncertainty but does not act because of potential risks, but rather act on potential benefits and awards.

- The content presented at the conference are things that I would have (or in most cases, already have read about) on the web. However, it was am incredible learning experience just to observe how world leader’s interact with each other. Although, it was awkward speaking with someone twice your age who’s there for different reasons than you are, the panel discussion involving the lawyers was well worth the costs of the conference.

- I did notice that all the speakers talked about the future and how it might look like. However, there was little discussion on how to reach there, or what kind of infrastructure is required. I guess the purpose of these summits is for each company to show off their own vision of the future, similar to that of concept car shows. Whatever is in the works is top secret.

09_canadian_telecom_summit_pic

- Peter Kao

Comment

My Workterm at Microsoft and What I have Discovered About It’s Culture

Working at Microsoft Canada in Mississauga last work-term has taught me many lessons. Lessons that weren’t directly applicable to my job title at the time, but lessons on where I want to be in terms of my career and what I want to do. Also, my work-term showed me just how much I hate the corporate culture – the cubicle job, the many politics, the fake smiles on people’s faces and so much more. It really got to me midway through.

Now, instead of continuing on with my complaints (there are many) there are some good aspects to working at a big company, especially for a marketing position. For one, the larger the company, the bigger their spending on advertising. So, as someone interested in getting his foot in the door with marketing Microsoft was an ideal place for me. Or so I thought…

The thing with big corporations is that their culture has matured to the point of saturation. At some point in time, Microsoft’s culture became a staple. If you didn’t think like them, you weren’t hired or kept for long. A company’s culture is extremely important and Microsoft failed to create a sustainable culture.

Microsoft’s culture is pretty obvious. One can smell it in the air upon setting foot in their premises. Many programmers know it, and try to avoid it – bashing Microsoft’s brand in the progress. What is Microsoft’s culture? I’ll put it in 2 short sentences: Microsoft’s culture is aggressively business-oriented. It is dominated by old-fashioned behaviour along the very tall hierarchy chain. 

Microsoft’s culture is aggressively business-oriented.

Microsoft, a software development company (now branched into hardware development, as well), has non-technical staff in all positions. At Microsoft Canada, I would say most employees were non-technical. I don’t expect the marketing division to have programmers, but  they should at least hire people who understand where technology is heading and the current internet phenomenon. So many project managers didn’t understand what Twitter is, let alone how to use it. There were even senior staff who don’t know how to copy and paste, resulting in tons of wasted time just re-typing everything.

It is dominated by old-fashioned behaviour along the very tall hierarchy chain.

I found this incredibly interesting. A few weeks into my work-term, I was happy to hear that Microsoft had recently replaced its staff with younger employees. I was expecting the workplace to be buzzing. Instead, it was stiffling. Senior staff did all of the talking and decision-making when it was clear that they weren’t the experts. I felt this first-hand. In one of my team’s monthly meetings, the higher-ups were discussing Microsoft and Google’s position on the market. I had a few inputs on this since I update myself daily with both companies, and plus I follow tech-internet news. I decided to send an email to the entire team, including the director of my work division to discuss an article I had found online. It was entirely appropriate since a few days before the team was scratching their heads on how to proceed. I received no replies back. It was after my work-term ended that I had found out the higher-management found my email to be (and I quote): “Inappropriately written for communicating with senior staff.” I believe I’m pretty good at writing emails. In fact, I’ve received several compliments before. The issue with my email wasn’t that it sounded “rude” but rather it was coming from a lowly co-op student.

Another fascinating event was when I had written a similar email (but of a different topic) regarding one of the emails another director had written. I was respectively opposing her point by writing to other Microsoft co-ops to initiate a discussion. Instead of a discussion, one of the co-ops told me that the director was way up there and that I shouldn’t be questionning her decisions. I should accept that she knows best and leave it as that. There was so much backlash that I just had to continue the debate. It was too interesting to just let it die off. It was clear to me that these students would be hired as full-time employees at Microsoft and continue the downward spiral of the company. They understood so little about their industry, yet they will dedicate years of their lives to it. Instead of spending time to learn more, they reject any ideas except those proposed by their immediate bosses. This was a trend with full-time’s as well.

Man, I can keep going on and on but I’m just going to cut it short. Microsoft is a dinosaur kind of a company: Ancient, big and slow.

Does the pride of a successful company always take over it’s culture? Is this the precursor to a lack of innovation that so many big firms face? As always, let me know what you think.

To cap it off, this is a print-out I scanned:

But Microsoft employees DO use Google Maps!

I had printed this off and someone at the printer picked it up and wrote a note. Funny thing is…everyone at Microsoft uses Google, they just don’t admit it infront of their bosses.

- Peter Kao

Comment

Odds of Success Calculator

I found this somewhere in my massive list of unread emails today.

The calculator asks you several things about your business or startup and  supposedly compares your results to  real-world data to calculate your chances of sucess!

Take a look!

- Peter Kao

Comment

What I’ve Learned from Guy Kawasaki’s Art of Innovation Presentation

I love Google Video. They have all the documentries in the world there.

Here are some key points that I’ve made from Guy Kawasaki’s Art of Innovation presentation. If you’ve seen his Art of the Start presentation, then these will look awfully familiar to you. In fact, I think he even used the same slides…

1) The DICEE Concept

Deep – does what it should and antipicates what you need. A product that goes above and beyond in solving a need.

Intelligence – pretty obvious. Put some thought into your products/services!

Complete – great products/services also include the support infrastructure around them, such as support, forums, conferences, websites – everything.

Elegance – has to be easy to use without a 50-page manual.

Emotive – Your product/service should polarize people. Either people will love it or absolutely hate it, but the point is nobody will become indifferent to your product or service.

2) Ride the Curve but Don’t Stay on the Same One
Don’t be 10-15% better at what you do, instead be 10-15 times better. This means that innovators should not always build on existing product/services that they are currently offering in order to meet changing demands, but rather to seek out the possibility of the ‘next curve’ and build products for it. 
   
3) Your First Iteration Will Suck, but That’s Okay
Here’s the truth about the tech business: We ship and then we test. Do this to ride the curve before anyone else, or the world will past you by.

4) Tips for Your Pitches – The ’10-20-30 Rule’

10 slides maximum

20 minutes for all the slides

30 is the optimal font size

The rest is for Q&A and other miscellaneous things.

 

You can view the entire video (~50 min. long) here:

Note: Google Video embeds are known to screw up. So if you want to watch the video full-screen, visit the original link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3459408090550854446

Peter Kao

Comment

The Government and Your Startup

One of the most annoying things with owning your own company is having to deal with the government. Here are some links that you should read over at least once before you start a business.

Online Services from the Government 1

Online Services from the Government 2

Reporting and Remitting Schedules

Tax FAQ’s for Small Businesses

General Information on Goods and Services Tax (GST)

The Basics of the Retail Sales Tax (RST)

How the RST Applies to Internet Related Services

How the RST Applies to Computer Programs and Related Services

Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Tax Incentive Program

 

The good thing is that there are free seminars from the government that cover most of the above. They also give you handy handouts and brochures too. Read my previous post, FREE Government Seminar Listings for Small Business.

EXTRA: Business Start-up Info Guide

Peter Kao

Comment

Google Proves Its “Do No Evil” Mantra With Google Chrome’s EULA Change

There are few companies out there that has the guts or care to keep a corporate philosophy that focuses on its consumers. Recently, Google proved that it really cared for its users.

Let me start off with an introduction to Google’s newest product, Google Chrome (get it here). It’s a web browser that has Google fans jumping for joy across the world and has even converted some Firefox users. Despite the fact that it’s still in Beta (aren’t most Google products? ex. Gmail) it has been benchmarked by geeks on scriptNode as the fastest browser on the market.

However, after a few hours post to the launch people started complaining about the End-User License Agreement (EULA) for the product. To put into layman terms, the EULA says that all information submitted using the browser belongs to Google. This obviously pissed off some people. It was a sign that Google had gone awry with its “Do No Evil” mantra and turned into the typical faceless corporation that cares little for its followers.

Within a few hours after hearing the complain, Google immediately added a new clause:

“11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.”

Which basically shut everyone up…including myself – I’m using Chrome to type this very entry! And I get to keep ownership of it too :)

Peter Kao

Comment

Effective Ways to Advertise to Students

I’m currently working on the marketing strategy for an upcoming University of Waterloo event – Yahoo’s Hack U and thought I would share with you a list of ways to advertise to students that I wrote up:

 

This is a compilation of very inexpensive but effective ways to advertise to students. Luckily, university (and college) students are fairly easy to market to since they spend a large amount of time in specific areas of the school. Students are also constantly seeking out ways to take their minds off of school. So, an ad that is displayed through offbeat methods (such as painting a giant rock, slapping an URL on it and dropping it near campus) can create strong and memorable messages, even for busy-minded students.

Without any more blabbering, here they are:

 

Conventional Methods

 

1) Plug it Everywhere

Your emails, MSN status, Facebook status, Twitter, Gtalk status, whatever. Plug a one-liner anywhere you can to maximize visibility. If you use any of the above and I’m sure you do, chances are your friends do too. The above list are all communication tools, so if your friends see it they can easily ask you what the product/service/event is about.

2) Power of a Website

Everyone uses the internet. Everyone. Websites are great ways to inform students in an engaging and non-intrusive manner, and additionally, advertisers can also see what messages work and what doesn’t by using analytic software such as Google Analytics and fine tune their advertising.

2a) Tell-a-Friend

With easy to install plugins like Sharethis, visitors of the website can share the contents of the website with their friends.

2b) Keepin’ Connected – 24/7

Again, plugins work wonders. Use a Twitter plugin to broadcast current happenings to let late-comers know that it’s not over yet!

3) Making Friends with Student Groups

Student groups such as class groups or clubs are easy to target. If you wish to promote an event relating to Application/Software development, ask a Computer Science class representative or a local hacker club leader to make a short mention.

4) School Paper

Active students read it. Enough said. All you need is a small mention, which is fairly easy to do if you’re advertising something that’s school-related. 

5) Hierarchy of Power  

Big fish eats small fish. Small fish eat some weird crap that’s smaller than them. Weird crap just floats around polluting the environment. Similarly, teachers eat students and students each some of the sickest crap on the planet. Anyways, the point is that students listen to teachers most of the time and that you can get the message across by broadcasting it in class.

 

Creative and Offbeat Methods

 

1) Chalkin’ the Campus

Students are always on the move, but the good thing is that they usually take the same paths into, through and out of school. Lighten up their scenery and put something new in their paths. They will surely notice that big pasty looking message in the middle of the path that they take every day. Oh, did I mention chalk is cheap? $4 for a bucket of it.

2) Door-hangers…for Doors

Where do students live? Simple, they’re in school residences or are living off-campus. Either way, they are living underneath a roof with a door (hopefully). Door-hangers have practically guaranteed presence. Think about it, you can’t leave the house without using the door! At least that holds true for us normal folks.

3) Man with a Stick

Imagine for a second. You are on the way to school and are already 10 minutes late. You’re walking so fast that people around you suspect you’re doing your power walk exercise (but you only do that after school). As you enter the school you see a guy holding a giant sign. One lone guy, with a sign. Your first thought would be on similar lines as, “What the Frig?” Then, you’ll slow down from your exercise, er fast walk, and look at the sign because it is so weird. Substitute man with a stick, with girl with a stick to make things even weirder.

 

You gotta have some fun while working ;)

Peter Kao

Comment

3-months Into My Startup: What I have learned

Before starting up my first company, Influenza Media I had read several books and hundreds of articles on how a startup should be and what to look out for, but it’s only after learning from firsthand experiences that I fully understand the reasoning behind the things that I’ve read.

I’ve listed these out with hopes that it’ll help out some young entrepreneurs :

1) Your team is key

Yeah yeah yeah. You probably hear this on a daily basis from your business mentors or websites that you visit, but it’s true. Here’s why: Startups require a tremendous amount of trust and energy. You need to have the trust of your colleagues in order to work efficiently. Nothing is worse than having to defend your position with each decision you make. Now, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t have discussions here and there to decide on the best move for your company, but some important decisions require blind faith. You don’t have time for 3-4 hour discussions to decide what colors to use for your website! In a startup, there will always be a time when you and your team cast doubts on the startup. Let me repeat: there will always be a time when you and your team cast doubts on the startup. This is why the energy of a startup is so important. This energy can come from different places such as passion for the industry, synergy between team members or the challenge that comes from a startup, but it’s the energy that helps wary team members from giving up. Here’s a tip for entrepreneurs that are still in school: Pick people that are close to you as founders, given that they have startup material. Either that or spend at least 2 months talking to the incumbent to learn more about him/her, or make them your roommates! (Read: Velocity)

2) Be resourceful and make do with what you have

If your co-founder wants an awesome looking website like the ones covered by the FWA you probably picked the wrong partner. Always do your homework and look for ways to get the best equipment, service and staff for the lowest cost. An example: I own a professional class printer that’s worth over $1,500 without having to pay a cent. How? Ask around for donations. I also have an executive chair that’s torn in a few places and some office furniture all without having to spend.

Here’s a tip: Never buy anything new for your startup. I don’t care if new things look shinier or last longer, you don’t need it to be new! Never give in to the temptation of buying something new. Do it for your personal life if you really have to, but don’t do it for your business. Always operate as lean as you can.

3) Trust your gut

You don’t have a lot to work with in a startup. To make it even worse, we (students) are used to working with problems where all the information is presented to us beforehand. That’s not the case with startups (and real life). If you have a hunch or an uneasy felling about something, stop what you are doing and think about it – critically. There has been times when I had a premonition that I didn’t act upon. It left me to suffer the consequences shortly afterwards.

4) Be humble and stay humble

A lot of business relationships have to do more about liking the other person than, oh say, dollar bills but that’s not the real point. The point is that entrepreneurs have to live with constant rejections and rude replies from prospective clients. When their business grows, usually their confidence and arrogance grows with it. Who can blame them? The important thing is to stay humble and to treat those you’ve surpassed with courteousness and respect, who knows what they might be talking about you behind your back?

Peter Kao

Comment

Complete List of Web Directories

If you have just finished building your corporate website, submitting your website to online directories may increase your ranking on search engines and generate more page landings.

See the huge list of web directories here: http://www.definiteweb.com/list-of-directories2.htm

There are TONS of directories in that list. However, I only recommend submitting to the major ones, especially the popular search engines:

1) Google – http://www.google.com/addurl/

2) Yahoo – https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/submit

3) MSN Live – http://search.live.com/docs/submit.aspx

4) Open Directory – http://www.dmoz.org

You should also invest in submitting your website into the Yahoo! Directory. It will cost you $299USD but it’s well worth it! It’s the YellowBook of the internet! Since we’re on the topic, make sure to submit your business in local business directories as well. YellowBook is a must considering it’s popular and FREE.

Peter Kao

Comment

FREE Government Seminar Listings for Small Business

Starting a business requires tons of work. A huge part of that work is doing the research and reading required to run your business “legally.”

Things like PST, Payrol deductions, Corporate taxes and ways to increase tax credits can be a headache. Luckily, the Canadian government supplies free seminars covering most topics on starting and maintaining your business. Check out their list of seminars here: http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/vnts/on/menu-eng.html

- Peter Kao

Comment

Save $200 dollars off Quickbooks Premier

$200 dollars off Quickbooks

Yes! Today, I finally got a chance to get back at companies that outsource their call centers.

I purchased Quickbooks Pro 2008 for my startup company – Influenza Media with the assumption that it will support multi-currencies just like ALL previous versions. Sadly, I found out that it only supports CDN currency when I got home.

I gave Quickbooks a call and asked about their “upgrade service”. Long story short, they asked for another $200 dollars to “upgrade” my Pro version to a Multicurrency version, which makes the total sum up to ~$400 dollars. That’s fine because they had told me that I could keep the Pro software…which means I can just return it back to Best Buy (where I bought the software) and get my full money back!

What costs $400 dollars – I got for $200 all from “upgrading” my software.

In your face India!

- Peter Kao

Comment